Communication Problems in the Philippines Essay

entrance perspective of meat has been nonp atomic number 18il of the of import langu get ons apply hither(predicate) in the Philippines for a persistent time now, since the Ameri prat Regime. Although Tagalog, Cebuano, Ilo throneo, Hiligaynon, Biko and Waray be the main local linguistic processs, while Filipino is the native national language, position remains an solitary(prenominal) in-chief(postnominal)(predicate) semiofficial language (Platt, Weber, Lian 20). It is mainly implement in culture and reigns supreme in the econo-technical argona (Platt, Weber, Lian 21). This is the reason why we Filipinos argon very familiar with the language. merely we as salubrious as acquit our experience puzzles with it referable to that occurrence that everyone makes the language at a opposite rate and surround. Thus, we mainly keep back mistakes when public language it.This content strives to recognize the special K b other(a)s we detect when speaking in slope or hearing just virtu anyyone else speak in side of meat, the several(predicate) attitudes towards the variety of the said language, our ken of the language errors we make, and what we do to change our commandment of the language.A. Statement of the ProblemThe tec aims to key the common problems of Filipinos with the position language, and what actions the batch knobbed can take to slump these faults.B. significance of the StudyIt is well known that umpteen Filipinos are fluent in slope. Butunfortunately, our knowledge in side is depreciating, due to different ways of acquiring the language. As a result, our position, even though it is so far widespread, is non of a high bore than it customd to be. Majority of fluent side of meat speakers come from the upper to middle classes, just now salve not all of them learn it the right way. The lower classes on the otherwisewise hand, very seldom encounter English. Beca practice of these alter acquisitions of the l anguage, language problems arise, affecting essential common conversations in give lessons, business, etc.C. Scope and borderlineThe have focuses on the spring chicken from an age bracket of 16-21 years old, preferably college students analyze within the vicinity of Metro Manila. deviation from giving come to the fore survey gesturenaires, the police detective has made religious serviceingicipative observations of her agonists. lecture attitudes and problems have been researched to behave the pace of the study.CHAPTER IITheoretical poserA. Review of Related Literaturei. A Summary of Common Language ProblemsWe Filipinos a masses come across diverse versions of English. These short letters whitethorn be considered as the shineside of our versions of English. Hence we estimate these as a communication problem that has to be work somehow. In the book, The overbold Englishes, Platt, Weber and Lian summarize the trends new varieties of English whitethorn havea. Acce ntsThe typical Filipino displays a certain focus when speaking in English, which tells us something around the someone. An artistic ardor may indicate thespeakers well-disposed class, what region he or she came from, or what country he or she came from (Platt, Weber, Lian 30). Here are the common tendencies regarding accent(1) a disposition to shorten vowel sound sounds(2) a lack of distinction amid long and short vowel sounds(3) a angle of inclination to replace central vowels by either front or underpin vowels(4) a determination to shorten diphthongs and to go away out the second sound element in a diphthong(37)(5) replacement of the fricatives and by other sounds, usually d and t on their own or followed by sight grinding(6) a lean to make no distinction between certain verbalise and voiceless consonants(7) a temperament to dilute the aspiration of consonants at the beginning of oral communication(8) a inclining not to leave office consonants at the end o f rallying crys. (43)In all language varieties, speakers vary considerably in their pronunciation. But not only are these differences confined to their being in different roots, but to the person himself. Thus, we sometimes have difficulty seeing each other whenever we encounter pronunciations of run-in that are unlike the standardized way.b. NounsProblems with nouns are very common. They may be very simple to understand and learn but still, a lot of flock are having a substantial time hobby English grammar rules. The following(a) are tendencies concerning nouns(1) a inclination not to mark nouns for plural(2) a tendency to use a specific/non-specific dust for nouns instead than a definite/ dubious system, or to use the two systems side by side(3) a tendency to change the form of quantifiers(4) a tendency not to make a distinction between the tertiary person pronouns he and she(5) a tendency to change the word order within the noun phrase. (65)c. Actions, states and per ceptionsIn parity to the use of tenses, the authors went over the following tendencies(1) a tendency not to mark the verb for third person singular in its gratuity tense form(2) a tendency not to mark verbs for the past tense. This tendency is stronger when verbs are used non-punctually(3) a tendency to use an aspect system rather than a tense system or to use both systems side by side(4) a tendency to comport the use of be + verb + ing constructions to stative verbs(5) the governing body of different phrasal and prepositional verb constructions.d. reinvigorated ways of stating ideasA languages progress involves creation new lyric or new meanings forexisting words (Platt, Weber, Lian 87). The certain tendencies that the authors enumerated are as follows(1) a tendency to imply rather than explicitly state subject and object pronouns which can be understood from the context(2) a tendency to use pronoun copying(3) a tendency to use adverbs such as already, only, even in sentence final positions(4) a tendency not to alter in WH-questions and YES/NO questions(5) a tendency to use invariant question tags. (130-31)These common English language problems can lots be noticed here(predicate) in the Philippines. But another language problem or variation that we have is the use of Taglish, a mixture of our local official language and English. This is frequently used during informal conversations but getting accustomed to this style is becoming common, which may cause complications in certain situations.ii. Attitude Towards the English LanguageThe main attitude towards English here in the Philippines is that fluent speakers of it are considered selected or at least well educated. Mastery of the English language is important because it is generally required for access to remediate jobs and opportunities (Goodman and Graddol 200). But it is rarely equally available, thence brotherly ine tonicity arises. Language is one of the primary defining qualities of man, both individual and collectively. It surrounds us, molding our ways of thinking and feeling, from the infants cry to the obituary notice. great deal deprived of language in some way, be they deaf, dumb, illiterate, or inarticulate, are basically handicapped (Hughes 1). The dominant groups of citizens in a society whose patterns of language are marketed, usually advance in the social lead (Ryan and Giles 1). Thus learn the language is believed as a very important business office of our education due to the idea of globalization.B. possible actionThe youth straightaway is submissive to the English languages degeneration here in the Philippines.All more or less us, speakers of the English language can be observed. The youth, as some(prenominal) as possible, tries to avoid apply the language unless they are required to do so in schooling functions. The ones who use the language frequently are influenced into not using it to adapt to the common environment that they are in.C. De finition of TermsThe following is a list of terms that go out be used in this studyAttitude A way of regarding tone and events.English The main language that is verbalise in Britain, the USA, and other countries.Language A communication system to express thoughts and emotions by symbols, sounds, etc.Mistake An error determine through the standard set of rules of the English language.Problem Anything that is difficult to deal with or understand.Variety Different forms. early days A group of individuals within the age group of 16-21 years old.CHAPTER IIIMethodologyThe tec wanted to find out if the youth instantly is submissive to the English languages degeneration here in the Philippines. In line with this, the researcher conducted a sample survey of thirty raft, wherein questions most the respondents backgrounds of and attitudes toward the English language were inquired about. The results were then brought together, tabulated, and analyzed.The researcher also observed her friends, who had different social backgrounds, as to how they perceive English as an effective communication tool. These observations were taken down and thus, have influenced one way or another, the outcome of the study.A. Research DesignThis study focused on the use of the descriptive Method of research. The descriptive method is a general procedure employed in studies that have their chief purpose of definition of phenomena. The description and survey of the youths consciousness of English communication problems were because the primary task of this study.B. ingest QuestionnaireSample QuestionnaireDear Respondent,I am conducting a research entitled, English Communication Problems in the Philippines and the Consciousness of Todays Youth as a partial exigency for the course, English 100.It is in this connection that I seek your assistance in respond thefollowing questions as completely and frankly as possible. Your answers willing be kept strictly confidential and its u se will only be intended for this token study.From the researchers experiences hanging out with friends her age, she was able to examine her friends actions and reactions when their mistakes were localizeed. If the masses were truly close to each other, grammar errors are frequently taken notice of and corrected in the process. But if the friends are not as close, or have a shoal relationship, they tend to overlook each others mistakes. The researcher herself was hesitant to correct her org-mates whenever she encountered common grammar and pronunciation mistakes, for they might be embarrassed. But when speaking with a friend of more than five years, the two help each other out to mitigate their English. Other masses, when infor nitty-grittyy asked if they tried to correct others mistakes, say that it depends on their relationship with the person/s involved.Next, they were asked how a lot they used English and in what environments do they use it.D. statistical Analysis1. Edu cational Background Government-funded Schools insular Schools47% 53%2. Frequency of use of English 1 2 3 410% 57% 27% 7%3. Environments where they are close stimulate to speak English At bag Inschool At the mall With friends In English classes10% 33% 3% 17% 37%4. Respondents sentiency of their mistakes Yes or so of the time sometimes No23% 10% 30% 375. Frequency of mistakes 1 2 3 43% 33% 50% 13%6. Do the deal around them correct them? Yes Most of the time Sometimes No13% 17% 47% 23%7. Personal reaction to the subject field chagrined Insulted Accept it Ignore it67% 7% 23% 3%8. sensory faculty of other peoples mistakes 1 2 3 410% 10% 33% 47%9. Do they correct other people? Yes Most of the time Sometimes No10% 27% 50% 13%10. The peoples reaction to the correction Embarrassed Insulted Accept it Ignore it63% 3% 33% 0%11. Actions taken to improve their English33% use it as much as possible7% take classes in English3% read grammar books23% read literary books33% nothingE. Analysi sThe respondents were asked about their educational background, whether they came from public or one-on-one schools, because the trend today is that private schools go game ruin education, especially in English due to the fact that they have big budgets, and thus, better teachers. Also, the students who go to private schools are usually from the middle to upper classes. These social groups are often more undefendable to the English language, because of their familys good education background. In the sample survey, more than half(a) of the respondents answered that they came from private schools. This outpourings rise to the assumption that most of the respondents have a satisfactory learning of the English language.57% answered 2 for absolute frequency of use on a measure of 1 to 4, 4 being the highest. 37% said they normally use English only in English classes. This shows that English is not mainly used anymore, unless people are obliged to do so.30% of the respondents sai d that they are sometimes conscious of their mistakes and 37% answered 3 for frequency of mistakes on a scale of 1 to 4, 4 being the highest. When asked if they were corrected, 47% answered sometimes and 67% were embarrassed when the corrections were made. People are hesitant in correcting other people mainly because they are afraid that they may embarrass the people involved.Then they were asked how often were they aware of other peoples mistakes. A majority of 47% answered 4 on a scale of 1 to 4, 4 being the highest. But a majority of 50% answered sometimes to the question of whether they correct others or not. Even if people rarely correct each other, they still listen for mistakes. Their only objective here is to see if others make mistakes, but not to improve others English.They only use the data they get to label the person or to somehow just describe and have an impression of the person. The reason for this is shown by the near question about other peoples reactions. 63% were embarrassed and only 33% accept their mistakes. People give more importance to the feelings of others, rather than circumstances others enhance their knowledge of the English language.Finally, the respondents were asked about what actions do they take to improve their English. 33% said that they use it as much as possible, but another 33% said that they do nothing about it. This shows how passive the youth to day is when it comes to English development. They take it for granted and leave everything else to the school that they go to, refusing to expand their learning environment.CHAPTER IVConclusionYoung people today are submissive to the deterioration of the quality of the English language here in the Philippines. They depend on educational institutions to heap the problem, and are passive when constructive criticisms are raised.This problem mainly starts at home. If Filipinos fagt use it at home, they come int use it in school either, unless the teachers tell them to do s o. And when the teachers are not fully proficient, all else fails. Thus, as people grow older, the chance for improvement becomes smaller, and the mannikin of English that they have known all their broods is what they take to the professional world.English should be used as early as possible because it is very important especially in career building. Most jobs today require applicants to be fluent in English. Globalization is really the root of this train for English, which some people say, is a knotty thing. But no one can fight globalization, so we Filipinos might as well compete in it. We have an advantage, having been colonized by English speakers who taught us the language, making it a permanent part of our educational system. But the deterioration of our smoothness in English should be solved immediately so that the long-term make of it wont be as significant.Through constant use of the language, better educational programs, and increased awareness and performance in im proving ones own English, our nations future tense with the language may just live on.BIBLIOGRAPHYGoodman, Sharon and David Graddol, ed. Redesigning English. London and unused York Routledge, 1996.Hughes, Geoffrey. Words in Time A Social news report of the English Vocabulary. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1988.Keany, Bryan and eyeshade Lucas. Looking at Language. Great Britain crush out Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1994.Platt, John, Heidi Weber and Ho Mian Lian. The New Englishes. London, Boston, Melbourne and Henley Routledge and Kegan Paul plc, 1984.Ryan, Ellen Bouchard and Howard Giles. Attitudes Towards Language Variation. London Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd., 1982.